| |
Concept:
|
AbessiveCase
|
Definition:
| AbessiveCase expresses the lack or absence of the referent of the noun it marks. It has the meaning of the English preposition 'without' (Pei and Gaynor 1954: 3,35; Gove, et al. 1966: 3).
|
Example:
|
|
|
| Language: |
Finnish |
| Source: |
Branch (1987:607) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
AblativeCase
|
Definition:
| AblativeCase expresses that the referent of the noun it marks is the location from which another referent is moving. It has the meaning 'from'.
|
Comment:
|
Lake Miwok has ten case enclitics, illustrated in the examples. In the vocative example, the gram marked as VOC is specific to 'mother'. Other kinship terms have their own special vocative forms.
|
Example:
|
|
|
| A flea is sitting on your forehead |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| He's standing in front of the king |
|
|
|
|
| He brought them to the king |
|
|
|
|
| The cat came out of there |
|
|
kaʔáppi -
father-
|
ni
COMIT
|
|
|
| I am walking with my father |
|
|
|
|
| Language: |
Miwok, Lake |
| Source: |
Mithun (1999:204-6),Callaghan (1963) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
AbsoluteFutureTense
|
Definition:
| AbsoluteFutureTense locates the event in question subsequent
to the present moment; it is a prediction of some state of affairs (Comrie
1985: 43-44).
|
Comment:
|
In Chepang, a simple Future may be expressed by suffixing /-caʔ/ to the main verb as in the first example. This affix may also be used to express epistemic possibility, hence the double gloss in that example. The second and third examples illustrate the use of the suffix /-kheʔ/, in combination with tense/aspect suffixes. Caughley characterizes the difference between these examples as follows: for the second 'the action as a completed unit is about to occur', and for the third the action 'is about to begin'. The fourth example illustrates another immediate future. Caughley refers to /-dhaŋ/ as the 'Near Future Marker'. It combines with the suffix /-caʔ/.
|
Example:
|
|
|
goʔ -
call-
|
ceʔ -
FUT-
|
na -
2-
|
ŋ
1.EXCL
|
|
|
| I will/may call you |
|
|
|
|
mak -
devour-
|
kheʔ -
IMMED-
|
ʔa -
PST-
|
thəy
GOAL
|
|
|
| A tiger is about to devour him |
|
|
kim -
house-
|
taŋ
ALLATIVE
|
|
dah -
arrive-
|
kheʔ -
IMMED-
|
naʔ
NONPST
|
|
|
| He is about to arrive at the house |
|
|
ŋa -
1.SG-
|
ʔi -
AGR-
|
dhaŋ
IMMEDFUT
|
|
yo -
look-
|
dhaŋ -
IMMEDFUT-
|
ca -
FUT-
|
ŋʔ
1.EXCL
|
|
|
| 'I am about to look/I will look now |
|
|
| Language: |
Chepang |
| Source: |
Bybee, Perkins, and Pagliuca (1994:245-246),Caughley (1982) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
AbsolutePastTense
|
Definition:
| AbsolutePastTense locates the situation in question prior to
the present moment (Comrie 1985: 41).
|
Comment:
|
Agaw reportedly has a past/non-past binary tense system. Hetzron reports that for the main forms of Agaw verbs, there are combinations of two tenses and two aspects. In Hetzron's description, the two tenses are called Imperfect (used for present and future expressions) and Perfect (for past expressions). The two aspects are Definite and Indefinite. The first example is what he calls the Imperfect Definite (with a Nonpast tense). The second is the Imperfect Indefinite (also Nonpast). The third example is the Perfect Definite (a Past). The fourth is the Perfect Indefinite (also Past). The Imperfect Indefinite and the Perfect Definite are the most frequent combinations.
|
Example:
|
|
|
|
|
| He is studying/He will study (uncertain) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| He studied (and still is)/He studied (uncertain) |
|
|
| Language: |
Agaw, Western |
| Source: |
Hetzron (1969:12-13) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
AbsolutePresentTense
|
Definition:
| AbsolutePresentTense locates the situation in question at
the present moment, though the situation rarely coincides exactly with the
present moment (Comrie 1985: 37).
|
Comment:
|
Yup'ik appears to have a grammaticalized 4-way Tense distinction. Mithun includes discussion of the variable amount of time subsumed by the Yup'ik Present Tense form in the first example. Depending on the discourse situation, the present tense can cover anywhere from a time shortly before the utterance, to a day or so afterwards. The span of time covered has less to do with objective time than it does with the immediate consciousness of a speaker/hearer with regards to the experience being described. The second and third examples illustrate Immediate Future and Simple Future in the language
|
Example:
|
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
AbsoluteRelativeTense
|
Definition:
| AbsoluteRelativeTense locates the event in question in
relation to a temporal reference point that, in turn, is referred to in
relation to the moment of utterance; the reference point and the moment of
utterance are not identical (Comrie 1985: 64-65).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
AbsoluteTense
|
Definition:
| AbsoluteTenseValue is the set of all values associated with
the grammatical encoding of an event's location in time where the moment of
utterance is the deictic center (Comrie 1985: 36).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
AbsolutiveCase
|
Definition:
| AbsolutiveCase in ergative-absolutive languages mark referents that would generally be the subjects of intransitive verbs or the objects of transitive verbs in the translational equivalents of nominative-accusative languages (Anderson 1985: 181; Crystal 1985: 1; Andrews and Avery 1985: 138).
|
Comment:
|
Blake uses the gloss NOM rather than ABS, a tradition among Australianists. Note in the examples above that the subject of the intransitive verb in the first example patterns after the object of the transitive verb in the second exa
mple.
|
Example:
|
|
|
w -
M-
|
eikér -
run-
|
ula
PRES
|
|
|
| The boy runs |
|
|
| Language: |
Avar |
| Source: |
Blake (2001:121),Ebeling (1966:77) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Abstract
|
Definition:
| Properties or qualities as distinguished from any particular
embodiment of the properties/qualities in a physical medium. Instances of
Abstract can be said to exist in the same sense as mathematical objects
such as sets and relations, but they cannot exist at a particular place and
time without some physical encoding or embodiment.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
AccusativeCase
|
Definition:
| AccusativeCase in nominative-accusative languages marks certain syntactic functions, usually direct objects (Hartmann and Stork 1972: 3,156; Crystal 1980: 11,246; Andrews and Avery 1985: 75; Anderson; 1985: 181; Mish et al. 1990: 50).
|
Comment:
|
Here the nominative is zero-marked. Also, in this language nonspecific objects do not take the accusative case.
|
Example:
|
|
|
|
|
| The director showed the letter to Hasan |
|
|
| Language: |
Turkish |
| Source: |
Blake (2001:87, 119),Comrie (1989:132-6, 175-6),Comrie (1976) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
AdessiveCase
|
Definition:
| AdessiveCase expresses that the referent of the noun it
marks is the location near/at which another referent exists. It has the
meaning of 'at' or 'near' (Crystal 1997: 8).
|
Example:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Language: |
Finnish |
| Source: |
Kiparsky (2001:316) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Adjectivalization
|
Definition:
| An adjectivalization is a partOfSpeech whose members differ grammatically from adjectives but which functions as them (Crystal 1997:260; Mish et al. 1990:801).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Adjective
|
Definition:
| An adjective is a part of speech whose members modify nouns. An adjective specifies the attributes of a noun referent. Note: this is one case among many. Adjectives are a class of modifiers (Crystal 1997:8; Mish et al. 1990:56; Payne 1997:63).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Adposition
|
Definition:
| An adposition is a part of speech whose members are of a closed set and occur before or after a complement composed of a noun phrase, noun, pronoun, or clause that functions as a noun phrase and forms a single structure with the complement to express its grammatical and semantic relation to another unit within a clause (Comrie 1989:91; Crystal 1997: 305; Mish et al. 1990:929; Payne 1997:86).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Adverb
|
Definition:
| An adverb, narrowly defined, is a part of speech whose members modify verbs for such categories as time, manner, place, or direction. An adverb, broadly defined, is is a part of speech whose members modify any constituent class of words other than nouns, such as verbs, adjectives, adverbs, phrases, clauses, or sentences. Under this definition, the possible type of modification depends on the class of the constituent being modified (Crystal 1997:11; Mish et al. 1990:59; Payne 1997:69).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
AdversativeCase
|
Definition:
| AdversativeCase expresses an antithetical circumstance. Adversative meaning can be expressed in several grammatical ways, such as through a conjunction (but), adverbial (however, nevertheless, yet, in spite of that, on the other hand), or preposition (despite, except, apart from, notwithstanding) (Crystal 1997: 11).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
AllativeCase
|
Definition:
| AllativeCase expresses motion to or toward the referent of the noun it marks (Pei and Gaynor 1954: 6,9,216; Lyons 1968: 299; Crystal 1985: 1213; Gove, et al. 1966: 55,2359).
|
Comment:
|
Lake Miwok has ten case enclitics, illustrated in the examples. In the vocative example, the gram marked as VOC is specific to 'mother'. Other kinship terms have their own special vocative forms.
|
Example:
|
|
|
| A flea is sitting on your forehead |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| He's standing in front of the king |
|
|
|
|
| He brought them to the king |
|
|
|
|
| The cat came out of there |
|
|
kaʔáppi -
father-
|
ni
COMIT
|
|
|
| I am walking with my father |
|
|
|
|
| Language: |
Miwok, Lake |
| Source: |
Mithun (1999:204-6),Callaghan (1963) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Animate
|
Definition:
| One of the two grammatical genders, or classes of nouns, the other being inanimate. Membership in the animate grammatical class is largely based on meanings, in that living things, including humans, animals, spirits, trees, and most plants are included in the animate class of nouns (Valentine 2001: 114).
|
Example:
|
|
|
mEtEg#O -
tree-
|
g
ANIM-
PL
|
|
|
| trees |
|
|
mEtEg#O -
tree-
|
s
DIM-
INANIM
|
|
|
| stick |
|
|
mEtEg#O -
tree-
|
s -
DIM-
|
g
INANIM-
PL
|
|
|
| sticks |
|
|
| Language: |
Potawatomi |
| Source: |
Buszard-Welcher (unpublished field notes) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Article
|
Definition:
| An article is a member of a small class of determiners that identify a noun's definite or indefinite reference, and new or given status (Crystal 1997:26; Mish et al. 1990:105).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
AspectValue
|
Definition:
| AspectValue is the class of values that may be associated with the feature instance 'aspect'. AspectValue is the class of all apsect types found in language. Aspect is the grammatical encoding of various characteristics of the event referred to in an utterance. Aspect does not form a semantically contiguous class (Comrie 1976; Bybee 1985; Sasse 2002).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Assumptive
|
Definition:
| Assumptive encodes the fact that the speaker came to believe the content of the expression through (possibly) unsound inference procedure. That is, it is at least reasonalbe (Palmer 2001: 6-8).
|
Comment:
|
Compare the first example, illustrating a Deductive Mood form, to the second example illustrating an Assumptive Mood form.
|
Example:
|
|
|
apé -
play-
|
yi
3.SG.PST-
DEDUCT
|
|
|
| He played soccer (I have seen evidence that he played, but I did not see him play) |
|
|
|
|
apé -
play-
|
hīyi
3.SG.PST-
ASSUMP
|
|
|
| He played soccer (I assume, but I have seen no evidence of this) |
|
|
| Language: |
Tuyuca |
| Source: |
Palmer (2001:36),Barnes (1984),Malone (1988) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Attribute
|
Definition:
| Qualities which we cannot or choose not to reify into
subclasses of Object.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
AuditoryEvidential
|
Definition:
| AuditoryEvidential encodes the fact that the speaker came to believe the content of the expression through direct auditory experience; they heard it. This does not include spoken reported accounts, but only direct sensory evdience, such as the situation of 'hearing a tree fall' (Palmer 2001: 38).
|
Comment:
|
Double notation with the visual evidential gloss in the first example is meant to indicate a circumfix. The second illustrates an Auditory Evidential.
|
Example:
|
a -
VIS-
|
pe -
come-
|
re
VIS
|
|
|
| [I see] it coming. |
|
|
pe -
come-
|
ra -
CUST-
|
rakae
AUD
|
|
|
| [I hear] it coming. |
|
|
| Language: |
Fasu |
| Source: |
Palmer (2001:38),Foley (1986) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
AversiveCase
|
Definition:
| Marks the noun whose referent is the object of avoidance; also called the evitative (Blake 1998: 154).
|
Example:
|
yanyi -
ghost-
|
ŋkuŋu
AVERS
|
|
|
|
| S/he is afraid of ghosts |
|
|
| Language: |
Kalkutung |
| Source: |
Blake (2001:154-155) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
BenefactiveCase
|
Definition:
| BenefactiveCase expresses that the referent of the noun it marks receives the benefit of the situation expressed by the clause (Crystal 1980: 43; Gove, et al. 1966: 203).
|
Example:
|
ama -
mother-
|
rentzat
SG.BEN
|
|
|
d -
3.ABS-
|
it -
PRES-
|
u -
PL-
|
t
AUX2.1.SG.ERG
|
|
|
|
| I have bought some flowers for mother |
|
|
| Language: |
Basque |
| Source: |
Saltarelli (1988:156) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
BoundRoot
|
Definition:
| BoundRoot is the class of bound units whose members are
common to a set of derived or inflected units, if any, when all bound
units are removed. They are not further analyzable into meaningful
elements, being morphologically simple. Also, they designate the principle
portion of meaning of the unit to which it belongs (Crystal 1985:268;
Hartmann and Stork 1972:199; Pei and Gaynor 1954:187-188; Mish et al.
1990:1023; Matthews 1991:64).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
BoundStem
|
Definition:
| BoundStem is the class of units whose members are
decomposable into a root or roots and a derivational unit, and are only
expressed by bound forms in the language (Crystal 1985:287; Mish et al.
1990:1154).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
CaseValue
|
Definition:
| CaseValue is the class of values that may be associated with the feature instance 'case'. CaseValue is the class of all case types found in language. Case is a system of marking dependent nouns for the type of relationship (syntactic or semantic) they bear to some other element in the sentence, such as a verb, noun, pronoun, or adposition(Pei and Gaynor 1954: 35; Crystal 1980: 5354; Anderson 1985: 179180; Andrews 1985: 7172; Mish et al. 1990: 211; Kuno 1973: 45; Blake 2001).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Categorical
|
Definition:
| Categorical encodes that fact that the speaker knows the expressed proposition to be true (Palmer 2001: 37, 68-69).
|
Comment:
|
The first example, with an assertion clitic, may be compared to the second with a categorical assertion clitic.
|
Example:
|
waŋa:y -
NEG-
|
ba: -
ASSERT-
|
na
3.ABS
|
|
|
|
| He didn't walk (again) |
|
|
guni:m -
mother-
|
baa -
ABS-
|
nu:
CATEGORIALASSERT-
2.OBL
|
|
balu -
die-
|
y -
COMM-
|
aga
IRREAL
|
|
|
| Your mother is bound to die |
|
|
| Language: |
Wangaaybuwan-ngiyambaa |
| Source: |
Palmer (2001:83),Donaldson (1980) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
CausalCase
|
Definition:
| Used to mark the noun whose referent is the cause of some event, found in Archi (Kibrik 1998: 468).
|
Example:
|
piciri -
pituri-
|
t̪uŋu
CAUS
|
|
|
|
|
|
| I'm high on pituri |
|
|
| Language: |
Kalkutung |
| Source: |
Blake (1979:47) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Character
|
Definition:
| Character is the minimal orthographic unit.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Class
|
Definition:
| Classes differ from Sets in two important respects. First,
Classes are not assumed to be extensional. That is, distinct Classes might
well have exactly the same instances. Second, Classes typically have an
associated `condition' that determines the instances of the Class. So, for
example, the condition `human' determines the Class of Humans. Note that
some Classes might satisfy their own condition (e.g., the Class of Abstract
things is Abstract) and hence be instances of themselves.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Clause
|
Definition:
| A clause is a minimal unit including a predicate, all arguments of the predicate, and all modifiers of the predicate and the arguments.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Clitic
|
Definition:
| Clitic is the class of units which members exhibit syntactic
characteristics of a lexical unit, but show evidence of being
morphologically bound to another lexical unit, the host, by being
unstressed or subject to word-level phonological rules (Crystal 1980:64;
Hartmann and Stork 1972:38; Anderson 1985:158; Klavans 1982: xi-xiv,
74-76,83,93-95,100-101; Zwicky 1977:5).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
CloseFutureTense
|
Definition:
| CloseFutureTense, also called 'immediate future', locates
the situation in question shortly after the moment of utterance (Dahl
1985:121; Comrie 1985:94; Bybee, Perkins, and Pagliuca 1994:
244-245).
|
Comment:
|
In Chepang, a simple Future may be expressed by suffixing /-caʔ/ to the main verb as in the first example. This affix may also be used to express epistemic possibility, hence the double gloss in that example. The second and third examples illustrate the use of the suffix /-kheʔ/, in combination with tense/aspect suffixes. Caughley characterizes the difference between these examples as follows: for the second 'the action as a completed unit is about to occur', and for the third the action 'is about to begin'. The fourth example illustrates another immediate future. Caughley refers to /-dhaŋ/ as the 'Near Future Marker'. It combines with the suffix /-caʔ/.
|
Example:
|
|
|
goʔ -
call-
|
ceʔ -
FUT-
|
na -
2-
|
ŋ
1.EXCL
|
|
|
| I will/may call you |
|
|
|
|
mak -
devour-
|
kheʔ -
IMMED-
|
ʔa -
PST-
|
thəy
GOAL
|
|
|
| A tiger is about to devour him |
|
|
kim -
house-
|
taŋ
ALLATIVE
|
|
dah -
arrive-
|
kheʔ -
IMMED-
|
naʔ
NONPST
|
|
|
| He is about to arrive at the house |
|
|
ŋa -
1.SG-
|
ʔi -
AGR-
|
dhaŋ
IMMEDFUT
|
|
yo -
look-
|
dhaŋ -
IMMEDFUT-
|
ca -
FUT-
|
ŋʔ
1.EXCL
|
|
|
| 'I am about to look/I will look now |
|
|
| Language: |
Chepang |
| Source: |
Bybee, Perkins, and Pagliuca (1994:245-246),Caughley (1982) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
ClosedFeature
|
Definition:
| ClosedFeature is the set of features with a simple value,
e.g., the feature 'tense' which may have the feature 'past' (Maxwell,
Simons and Hayashi 2001).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
ClosedMorphoSyntacticFeature
|
Definition:
| ClosedMorphoSyntacticFeature identifies the particular
grammatical category to which a simple FeatureValue is assigned. It is the
first member of a FeatureSpecification. Any grammatical category, such as
'tense' or 'aspect', can be represented as a ClosedMorphoSyntacticFeature
in a given language. A set of Features forms an integral part of a
language's FeatureSystem. (Maxwell, Simons and Hayashi
2001).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
ClosedSpecification
|
Definition:
| ClosedSpecification is a kind of FeatureSpecification whose
first element must be an instance of Feature and whose second element must
be an instance of FeatureValue (Maxwell, Simons, and Hayashi
2001).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
ComitativeCase
|
Definition:
| ComitativeCase expresses accompaniment. It carries the meaning 'with' or 'accompanied by' (Anderson, Stephen 1985: 186; Pei and Gaynor 1954: 42;Dixon, R. 1972: 12; Gove, et al. 1966: 455).
|
Comment:
|
Lake Miwok has ten case enclitics, illustrated in the examples. In the vocative example, the gram marked as VOC is specific to 'mother'. Other kinship terms have their own special vocative forms.
|
Example:
|
|
|
| A flea is sitting on your forehead |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| He's standing in front of the king |
|
|
|
|
| He brought them to the king |
|
|
|
|
| The cat came out of there |
|
|
kaʔáppi -
father-
|
ni
COMIT
|
|
|
| I am walking with my father |
|
|
|
|
| Language: |
Miwok, Lake |
| Source: |
Mithun (1999:204-6),Callaghan (1963) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Commisive
|
Definition:
| Commisive encodes that the speaker promises or threatens to perform some action (Palmer 2001: 10, 72).
|
Comment:
|
Palmer notes that most languages do not have a specific grammatical form for Commisives. In Ngiyambaa it appears that the marker glossed COMM combined with the Irrealis marker is used epistemically for 'might' or 'likely' and deontically for authoritative 'shall'. Palmer also reports that Ngiyambaa has a different inflectional form for the obligative or 'purposive' mood.
|
Example:
|
waŋa:y -
NEG-
|
ndu -
2.NOM-
|
gal
PL
|
|
dhagurma -
cemetery-
|
gu
DAT
|
|
yana -
go-
|
y -
COMM-
|
aga
IRREAL
|
|
|
| You shall none of you go to the cemetery |
|
|
| Language: |
Wangaaybuwan-ngiyambaa |
| Source: |
Palmer (2001:36),Donaldson (1980) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
ComparativeCase
|
Definition:
| ComparitiveCase expresses that the referent of the noun it marks has some property to a lesser extent than that of the referent of some other noun; found in Archi (Kibrik 1998: 469) and in some Dravidian languages (Blake 1998: 155).
|
Example:
|
qɪinn -
bridge-
|
i -
OBL.SG-
|
Xur
COMPAR
|
|
|
| than a/the bridge |
|
|
| Language: |
Archi |
| Source: |
Kibrik (1991:256) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
CompletiveAspect
|
Definition:
| CompletiveAspect, also called the egressive,
encodes the end portion of some event. In order to be a completive, the
case in question should be clearly differentiated in the grammar from an
ordinary perfective which also implies that the event is completed (Bybee,
Perkins, and Pagliuca 1994: 54; Payne 1997: 240; Dahl 1999:
33).
|
Comment:
|
The first example, with completive aspect, may be compared with the second example, which lacks completive aspect.
|
Example:
|
i -
1.SG-
|
vu -
paddle-
|
kia
COMPL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| I paddled to Domove, and then cast my net. |
|
|
|
|
e -
1.SG-
|
keoi -
cast.net-
|
na
APPL
|
|
|
| I went fishing |
|
|
| Language: |
Warembori |
| Source: |
Donohue (1999a:65) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
ComplexFeature
|
Definition:
| ComplexFeature is the set of features which have complex
values, that is, which have a FeatureSpecification as its value (Maxwell,
Simons and Hayashi 2001).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
ComplexLexicalUnit
|
Definition:
| ComplexLexicalUnit
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
ComplexMorphoSyntacticFeature
|
Definition:
| ComplexMorphoSyntacticFeature identifies the particular
grammatical category to which a FeatureSpecification is assigned. This
class is used to assign multiple values to a single feature, e.g.,
'agreement' (Maxwell, Simons and Hayashi 2001).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
ComplexOrthWord
|
Definition:
| A ComplexOrthWord is made up of two or more
WrittenLinguisticExpressions.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
ComplexSpecification
|
Definition:
| ComplexSpecification is a kind of FeatureSpecification whose
first element must be an instance of Feature and whose second element must
be an instance of FeatureStructure. This class gives a feature system its
recursive properites (Maxwell, Simons, and Hayashi 2001).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Compound
|
Definition:
| Compound
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Connective
|
Definition:
| Also known as a conjunction, a Connective is a class of parts of speech whose members syntactically link words or larger constituents, and expresses a semantic relationship between them. A conjunction is positionally fixed relative to one or more of the elements related by it, thus distinguishing it from constituents such as English conjunctive adverbs (Crystal 1997:81; Mish et al. 1990:277-278).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
ContablativeCase
|
Definition:
| ContablativeCase expresses that the referent of the noun it marks is the location from near which another referent is moving. It has the meaning 'from near'.
|
Example:
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
lit
SG.SUPERESS
|
|
|
| on the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBESS
|
ʟ́
|
|
|
| under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INESS
|
a
|
|
|
| inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
um -
PL.INTERESS
|
če -
|
qɪ
|
|
|
| between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERLAT
|
t̄ -
|
iš
|
|
|
| onto the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBLAT
|
L'ak
|
|
|
| towards the underneath of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.ILL
|
a -
|
k
|
|
|
| into the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INTERLAT
|
qɪak
|
|
|
| towards the middle of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTLAT
|
rak
|
|
|
| in the vicinity of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERABL
|
t̄iš
|
|
|
| from over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBABL
|
L'aš
|
|
|
| from under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INABL
|
a -
|
ŝ
|
|
|
| from within the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERABL
|
qɪaŝ
|
|
|
| from between the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTABL
|
raš
|
|
|
| from near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERALL
|
t̄iši
|
|
|
| towards over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBALL
|
L'aši
|
|
|
| towards under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INALL
|
aši
|
|
|
| towards inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
PL.INTERALL
|
um -
|
če -
|
qɪaši
|
|
|
| towards between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTALL
|
rši
|
|
|
| towards near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERTRANS
|
t̄iXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBTRANS
|
L'aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTRANS
|
aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERTRANS
|
qIaXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
| Language: |
Archi |
| Source: |
Kibrik (1998:470-1) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
ContallativeCase
|
Definition:
| ContallativeCase expresses that something is moving toward the vicinity of the referent of the noun it marks. It has the meaning 'towards the vicinity of'.
|
Example:
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
lit
SG.SUPERESS
|
|
|
| on the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBESS
|
ʟ́
|
|
|
| under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INESS
|
a
|
|
|
| inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
um -
PL.INTERESS
|
če -
|
qɪ
|
|
|
| between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERLAT
|
t̄ -
|
iš
|
|
|
| onto the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBLAT
|
L'ak
|
|
|
| towards the underneath of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.ILL
|
a -
|
k
|
|
|
| into the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INTERLAT
|
qɪak
|
|
|
| towards the middle of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTLAT
|
rak
|
|
|
| in the vicinity of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERABL
|
t̄iš
|
|
|
| from over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBABL
|
L'aš
|
|
|
| from under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INABL
|
a -
|
ŝ
|
|
|
| from within the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERABL
|
qɪaŝ
|
|
|
| from between the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTABL
|
raš
|
|
|
| from near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERALL
|
t̄iši
|
|
|
| towards over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBALL
|
L'aši
|
|
|
| towards under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INALL
|
aši
|
|
|
| towards inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
PL.INTERALL
|
um -
|
če -
|
qɪaši
|
|
|
| towards between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTALL
|
rši
|
|
|
| towards near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERTRANS
|
t̄iXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBTRANS
|
L'aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTRANS
|
aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERTRANS
|
qIaXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
| Language: |
Archi |
| Source: |
Kibrik (1998:470-1) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
ContentBearingObject
|
Definition:
| Any SelfConnectedObject that expresses
information.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
ConterminativeCase
|
Definition:
| ConterminativeCase expresses the notion of something moving into the vicinity of the referent of the noun it marks, but not through that region. It has the meaning 'moving into the vicinity of'.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
ContlativeCase
|
Definition:
| ContlativeCase expresses that the referent of the noun it marks is the location in the vicinity of which another referent is moving. It has the meaning 'in the vicinity of'.
|
Example:
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
lit
SG.SUPERESS
|
|
|
| on the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBESS
|
ʟ́
|
|
|
| under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INESS
|
a
|
|
|
| inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
um -
PL.INTERESS
|
če -
|
qɪ
|
|
|
| between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERLAT
|
t̄ -
|
iš
|
|
|
| onto the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBLAT
|
L'ak
|
|
|
| towards the underneath of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.ILL
|
a -
|
k
|
|
|
| into the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INTERLAT
|
qɪak
|
|
|
| towards the middle of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTLAT
|
rak
|
|
|
| in the vicinity of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERABL
|
t̄iš
|
|
|
| from over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBABL
|
L'aš
|
|
|
| from under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INABL
|
a -
|
ŝ
|
|
|
| from within the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERABL
|
qɪaŝ
|
|
|
| from between the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTABL
|
raš
|
|
|
| from near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERALL
|
t̄iši
|
|
|
| towards over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBALL
|
L'aši
|
|
|
| towards under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INALL
|
aši
|
|
|
| towards inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
PL.INTERALL
|
um -
|
če -
|
qɪaši
|
|
|
| towards between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTALL
|
rši
|
|
|
| towards near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERTRANS
|
t̄iXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBTRANS
|
L'aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTRANS
|
aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERTRANS
|
qIaXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
| Language: |
Archi |
| Source: |
Kibrik (1998:470-1) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
CoordinatingConnective
|
Definition:
| A coordinating connective is a connective that links constituents without syntactically subordinating one to the other (Crystal 1997:93; Mish et al. 1990:288).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
DativeCase
|
Definition:
| DativeCase marks 1) indirect objects (for languages in which they are held to exist) or 2) nouns having the role of recipient (as of things given), beneficiary of an action, or possessor of an item (Crystal 1980: 102; Gove, et al. 1966: 577).
|
Comment:
|
Here the nominative is zero-marked. Also, in this language nonspecific objects do not take the accusative case.
|
Example:
|
|
|
|
|
| The director showed the letter to Hasan |
|
|
| Language: |
Turkish |
| Source: |
Blake (2001:87, 119),Comrie (1989:132-6, 175-6),Comrie (1976) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Deductive
|
Definition:
| Deductive encodes the fact that the speaker came to believe the content of the expression through sound inference procedure. That is, it is the only possible conclusion (Palmer 2001: 6-8).
|
Comment:
|
Compare the first example above illustrating the Deductive 'cha'-form to the second example illustrating the Speculative 'sica' form in this language.
|
Example:
|
|
|
| At that time the baptismal certificate must have been incomplete (deduced) |
|
|
yuyanacurca -
they.were.thinking-
|
sica
DEDUCT
|
|
|
|
|
|
| I suppose they were thinking he was a child (speculated) |
|
|
| Language: |
Inga |
| Source: |
Palmer (2001:27-28),Levinsohn (1975) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
DelativeCase
|
Definition:
| DelativeCase expresses motion downward from the referent of the noun it marks (Pei and Gaynor 1954: 53; Gove, et al. 1966: 595).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
DerivationalUnit
|
Definition:
| DerivationalUnit is the class of sublexical units whose
members function to derive a new lexical unit from an existing one, by
systematically changing the meaning and possibly altering the partOfSpeech
feature of the Root or Stem it attaches to (Hartmann and Stork 1972:62;
Crystal 1985:89; Mish et al. 1990:342; Bybee 1985:81-82,
99).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Determiner
|
Definition:
| A Determiner is a partOfSpeech whose members belong to a class of noun modifiers and express the reference, including quantity, of a noun (Crystal 1997:112; Mish et al. 1990:346).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
DirectEvidential
|
Definition:
| DirectEvidential, also called sensory, encodes the fact that the speaker came to believe the content of the expression by having direct sensory experience of some situation; this does not include hearing about it from someone else (Palmer 2001: 35-36).
|
Comment:
|
Palmer refers to the Direct Evidential as Sensory Evidential and the Indirect Evidential as the 'reported' or 'linguistic evidential'
|
Example:
|
ŋindu -
you-
|
gara
NOM-
SENSE
|
|
|
|
| One can see you were sick |
|
|
ŋindu -
you-
|
dhan
NOM-
LINGEVID
|
|
|
|
| You are said to have been sick |
|
|
| Language: |
Wangaaybuwan-ngiyambaa |
| Source: |
Palmer (2001:36),Donaldson (1980) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
DirectionalCase
|
Definition:
| Represents a dynamic spatial relation (involving movement) between two Objects.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Dubitative
|
Definition:
| Dubitative encodes a speakers doubt or uncertainty about a proposition (Palmer 2001).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
DynamicityAspect
|
Definition:
| DynamicityAspect refers to the degree to which an event is expressed as an on going process, i.e., as progressive or not (Bybee, Perkins and Pagliuca 1994: 127-139).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
ElativeCase
|
Definition:
| ElativeCase expresses that the referent of the noun it marks is the location out of which another referent is moving. It has the meaning 'out of' (Lyons 1968: 299; Pei and Gaynor 1954: 64; Crystal 1985: 106; Gove, et al. 1966: 730).
|
Example:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Language: |
Finnish |
| Source: |
Kiparsky (2001:316) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Enclitic
|
Definition:
| An enclitic is a clitic that is phonologically joined at
the end of a preceding lexical unit to form a single phonological unit
(Crystal 1980:64; Pei and Gaynor 1954:65; Mish et al.
1990:409).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Entity
|
Definition:
| The universal class of individuals. This is the root node of
the ontology.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
EquativeCase
|
Definition:
| EquativeCase expresses 'likeness of' or 'identity to' the referent of the noun it marks. It mean: 'as', 'like', and 'in the capacity of'; in some instances, it may have the meaning 'occurs in the manner typical of the referent' (Kibrik 1998: 469).
|
Example:
|
te -
they-
|
jamj
OBL.PL.ERG
|
|
|
|
za -
REFL.OBL.PL-
|
qɪdi
EQU
|
|
|
|
|
| They want us to sign in their fashion |
|
|
| Language: |
Archi |
| Source: |
Kibrik (1998:470) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
ErgativeCase
|
Definition:
| ErgativeCase in ergative-absolutive languages generally identifies the subject of transitive verbs in the translation equivalents of nominative-accusative Languages such as English (Crystal 1980: 134; Hartmann and Stork 1972: 78; Pei and Gaynor 1954: 67; Andrews and Avery 1985: 138).
|
Comment:
|
Blake uses the gloss NOM rather than ABS, a tradition among Australianists. Note in the examples above that the subject of the intransitive verb in the first example patterns after the object of the transitive verb in the second exa
mple.
|
Example:
|
|
|
w -
M-
|
eikér -
run-
|
ula
PRES
|
|
|
| The boy runs |
|
|
| Language: |
Avar |
| Source: |
Blake (2001:121),Ebeling (1966:77) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
EssiveCase
|
Definition:
| EssiveCase expresses that the referent of the noun it marks
is the location at which another referent exists (Lyons 1968: 299,301;
Gove, et al. 1966: 778; Crystal 1985: 112; Blake 1994:=
154-5).
|
Comment:
|
Lake Miwok has ten case enclitics, illustrated in the examples. In the vocative example, the gram marked as VOC is specific to 'mother'. Other kinship terms have their own special vocative forms.
|
Example:
|
|
|
| A flea is sitting on your forehead |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| He's standing in front of the king |
|
|
|
|
| He brought them to the king |
|
|
|
|
| The cat came out of there |
|
|
kaʔáppi -
father-
|
ni
COMIT
|
|
|
| I am walking with my father |
|
|
|
|
| Language: |
Miwok, Lake |
| Source: |
Mithun (1999:204-6),Callaghan (1963) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
EvaluativeValue
|
Definition:
| EvaluativeValue is the class of values that may be associated with the feature instance 'evaluative'. EvaluativeValue is the class of all evaluative types found in language.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Feature
|
Definition:
| Feature, also called a quality or a feature name, is the
class of attributes that may be associated with entities. Features have as
their values instances of FeatureValue. That is, specific features have
specific values associated with them, e.g., the feature 'tense' has 'past',
'present', ..., 'future' as values. In the broader domain, the class of
Feature can be thought of as the set of qualities associated with some
object in general, e.g., color, size, shape, etc. (Shieber 1986: 12;
G=C3=A4rdenfors 2000; Masolo et al. 2002).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
FeatureConstraint
|
Definition:
| FeatureConstraint is the class of all lists, duples, which
contain as the first member a partOfSpeechValue and, as its second, a set
of Features. This essentially gives part of speech a priviledged status in
a FeatureSystem. That is, the part of speech determines which Features may
be associated with a particular linguistic unit.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
FeatureSpecification
|
Definition:
| A FeatureSpecification is an ordered list, a duple, whose
first element must be an instance of Feature and whose second element is
either an instance of FeatureValue or FeatureStructure (Maxwell, Simons,
and Hayashi 2001).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
FeatureStructure
|
Definition:
| A FeatureStructure is a set of zero or more
FeatureSpecifications. A FeatureStructure is a kind of information
structure, a container or data structure, expressly to group qualities or
features of some object. In a grammatical feature system, a
FeatureStructure holds the grammatical information associated with some
linguistic unit. In a typed feature system, a FeatureStructure has an
associated type, usually a PartOfSpeechValue. (Shieber 1986; Maxwell,
Simons, and Hayashi 2001).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
FeatureSystem
|
Definition:
| FeatureSystem is the class of grammatical systems which uses
features and values to represent grammatical information. It can be assumed
that only one feature system exists per language data project. A
FeatureSystem consists of a set of FeatureValueAssociations, which is a set
of features and their allowable values, and a set of FeatureConstraints
(Maxwell, Simons, and Hayashi 2001).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
FeatureValue
|
Definition:
| FeatureValue is the class of values that may be associated
with instances of Feature. That is, specific features have specific feature
values associated with them, e.g., the feature 'tense' has 'past',
'present', ..., 'future' as values. In the broader domain, the class of
FeatureValue can be thought of as the set of qualia associated with some
feature in general, a point in cognitive space. E.g., red is a quale in
color space (Shieber 1986: 12; Maxwell, Simons, and Hayashi 2001;
G=C3=A4rdenfors 2000; Masolo et al. 2002).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
FeatureValueAssociation
|
Definition:
| FeatureValueAssociation is the class of all lists, duples,
which contain as the first member a Feature and as the second a set of
FeatureValues.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
FolkloreEvidential
|
Definition:
| FolkloreEvidential encodes the fact that the speaker came to believe the content of the expression through legend, folklore or some other established tradition (Palmer 2001: 40).
|
Comment:
|
Palmer refers to the folklore evidential as a general knowledge evidential. The first example, a Folklore Evidential, may be compared to the hearsay evidential in the second example. The hearsay evidential in this language appears to subsume Second and Thirdhand Evidentials. The third example illustrates the Inference Evidential.
|
Example:
|
čhéemul -
rain.fell-
|
ʔma
FOLK
|
|
|
| It rained (that's an established fact) |
|
|
čhéemul -
rain.fell-
|
ʔdo
HSY
|
|
|
| It rained (I was told) |
|
|
čhéemul -
rain.fell-
|
ʔka
INFEVID
|
|
|
| It rained (everything is wet) |
|
|
| Language: |
Pomo, Central |
| Source: |
Palmer (2001:6),Mithun (1999) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
FreeRoot
|
Definition:
| FreeRoot is the class of free units whose members are common
to a set of derived or inflected units, if any, when all bound units are
removed. They are not further analyzable into meaningful elements, being
morphologically simple. Also, they designate the principle portion of
meaning of the unit to which it belongs (Crystal 1985:268; Hartmann and
Stork 1972:199; Pei and Gaynor 1954:187-188; Mish et al. 1990:1023;
Matthews 1991:64).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
FreeStem
|
Definition:
| FreeStem is the class of units whose members are
decomposable into a root or roots and a derivational unit. They are
expressed by the free forms of the language (Crystal 1985:287; Mish et al.
1990:1154).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
FutureInFutureTense
|
Definition:
| FutureInFutureTense locates the situation in question in the
future, relative to a temporal reference point that itself is located in
the future relative to the moment of utterance.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
FutureInPastTense
|
Definition:
| FutureInPastTense locates the situation in question in the
future, relative to a contextually determined temporal reference point that
itself must be located in the past relative to the moment of
utterance.
|
Comment:
|
Here the tense of the auxiliary 'to be' locates a a past or future reference point relative to which the main verb occurs. The first example may be understood as Past in Past, or Past Perfect. The second may be understood as Past in Future, or Future Perfect. The third example may be understood as Future in Past. Comrie calls this last 'Conditional'.
|
Example:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Language: |
Maltese |
| Source: |
Comrie (1985:77) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
FuturePerfectTense
|
Definition:
| FuturePerfectTense locates the situation in question before
a contextually determined temporal reference point that must be located in
the future relative to the moment of utterance (Comrie
1985:69-71).
|
Comment:
|
Here the tense of the auxiliary 'to be' locates a a past or future reference point relative to which the main verb occurs. The first example may be understood as Past in Past, or Past Perfect. The second may be understood as Past in Future, or Future Perfect. The third example may be understood as Future in Past. Comrie calls this last 'Conditional'.
|
Example:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Language: |
Maltese |
| Source: |
Comrie (1985:77) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Gender
|
Definition:
| A grammatical category used for the analysis of word-classes displaying such contrasts as masculine/feminine/neuter, animate/inanimate, etc. (Crystal 1980: 164-165).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
GenderValue
|
Definition:
| GenderValue is the class of values that may be associated with the feature instance 'gender'. GenderValue is the class of all gender types found in language.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
GeneralAbilitive
|
Definition:
| GeneralAbilitive is a very frequently occurring modality which encodes that the agent is able to perform some action. The conditions are external to the agent (Bybee, Perkins, and Pagliuca 1994: 177; Palmer 2001: 76)
|
Comment:
|
The first two Lisu examples may be interpreted as General Abilitive Mood. The third illustrates Mental Abilitive Mood. The fourth illustrates Physical Abilitive Mood.
|
Example:
|
|
|
|
|
|
tyè -
freedom.taboo-
|
a̪
DEC
|
|
|
| It is not taboo for Asa to hoe fields |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bala -
no.hindrance-
|
a̪
DEC
|
|
|
| Asa is free to hoe fields |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kwú -
mentally.able-
|
a̪
DEC
|
|
|
| Asa is able (knows how) to hoe fields |
|
|
|
|
| Asa is physically able to hoe fields |
|
|
| Language: |
Lisu |
| Source: |
Palmer (2001:77),Hope (1974) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
GenitiveCase
|
Definition:
| GenitiveCase is used to mark the noun whose referent is the possessor of the referent of another noun (Crystal 1980: 161; Hartmann and Stork 1972: 9495,180; Pei and Gaynor 1954: 82,172; Anderson 1985: 185; Mish et al. 1990: 511; Fleming 1988: 10).
|
Comment:
|
Lake Miwok has ten case enclitics, illustrated in the examples. In the vocative example, the gram marked as VOC is specific to 'mother'. Other kinship terms have their own special vocative forms.
|
Example:
|
|
|
| A flea is sitting on your forehead |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| He's standing in front of the king |
|
|
|
|
| He brought them to the king |
|
|
|
|
| The cat came out of there |
|
|
kaʔáppi -
father-
|
ni
COMIT
|
|
|
| I am walking with my father |
|
|
|
|
| Language: |
Miwok, Lake |
| Source: |
Mithun (1999:204-6),Callaghan (1963) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
GrammaticalCase
|
Definition:
| Subsumes the Cases that are assigned by the verb. These Cases often correspond to the SemanticRoles in the Sentence.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
HabitualAspect
|
Definition:
| HabitualAspect, also called the durative, encodes the situation where an event takes place over an extended period of time. This is, it refers to not just one event but many events of the same type. The occurrence of the events may be protracted indefinitely in time. If the event is a state, then the state is said to hold for some time. If the event is an achievement or an accomplishment, then it may occur again and again. The time interval which is relevant to the habitual is relatively longer than in the case of the iterative (Comrie 1976: 28; Bybee 1985: 142; Payne 1997: 241; Dahl 1999: 32).
|
Example:
|
|
|
| He/she eats rice habitually |
|
|
|
|
| He/She repeatedly ate rice |
|
|
| Language: |
Ewe |
| Source: |
Payne (1997:242) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
HesternalPastTense
|
Definition:
| HesternalPastTense locates the situation in question
somewhere in the span beginning with the period defined culturally as
'yesterday' and extends back through some period that is considered
nonremote (Comrie 1985:87-88; Dahl 1985:126).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
HodiernalFutureTense
|
Definition:
| HodiernalFutureTense locates the situation in question after
the moment of utterance within the span culturally defined as 'today'
(Comrie 1985: 86; Bybee, Perkins, and Pagliuca 1994: 247).
|
Comment:
|
The affix kũ- in the first example may be used to mark either Hodiernal Past or Hodiernal Future depending on what aspect markers co-occur with it in the verb. Also, in the examples above, the final vowel of each verb is phonological, hence there is no correspondent for it in the interlinear gloss.
|
Example:
|
|
|
a -
2.SG-
|
kũ -
HODFUT-
|
nyu -
drink
|
a
|
|
|
|
| Kamau will drink porridge (within the day) |
|
|
|
|
a -
2.SG-
|
rĩĩ -
CLOSEFUT-
|
nyu -
drink
|
a
|
|
|
|
| Kamau will drink porridge (within the next few days) |
|
|
|
|
a -
2.SG-
|
rĩĩ -
REMFUT-
|
nyu -
drink
|
a
|
|
|
|
| Kamau will drink porridge (sometime beyond a few days from now) |
|
|
| Language: |
Gikuyu |
| Source: |
Mugane (1997) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
HodiernalPastTense
|
Definition:
| HodiernalPastTense locates the situation in question before
the moment of utterance within the span culturally defined as 'today'
(Comrie 1985:87; Dahl 1985:125-126)
|
Comment:
|
Bybee, et al divide past tense systems into those that refer to daily cycles and those that do not. Typically, languages with past tenses that refer to a daily cycle will have tense that specifies 'today' and all others will refer to spans of time prior to 'today' (Bybee, et al 1994:99, Dahl 1985:125; Comrie 1985:93). Cocama is such a language. The examples above illustrate its three-way system of remoteness distinctions in the past tense.
|
Example:
|
|
|
| I went to town a long time ago |
|
|
|
|
tutsu -
go-
|
icuá
PREHODPST
|
|
|
| I went to town yesterday/a few days ago |
|
|
|
|
| Language: |
Cocama-cocamilla |
| Source: |
Bybee, Perkins, and Pagliuca (1994:98-99),Faust (1978) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
IllativeCase
|
Definition:
| IllativeCase expresses that the referent of the noun it marks is the location into which another referent is moving. It has the meaning 'into' (Lyons 1968: 299; Gove, et al. 1966: 1126; Crystal 1985: 152).
|
Example:
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
lit
SG.SUPERESS
|
|
|
| on the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBESS
|
ʟ́
|
|
|
| under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INESS
|
a
|
|
|
| inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
um -
PL.INTERESS
|
če -
|
qɪ
|
|
|
| between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERLAT
|
t̄ -
|
iš
|
|
|
| onto the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBLAT
|
L'ak
|
|
|
| towards the underneath of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.ILL
|
a -
|
k
|
|
|
| into the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INTERLAT
|
qɪak
|
|
|
| towards the middle of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTLAT
|
rak
|
|
|
| in the vicinity of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERABL
|
t̄iš
|
|
|
| from over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBABL
|
L'aš
|
|
|
| from under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INABL
|
a -
|
ŝ
|
|
|
| from within the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERABL
|
qɪaŝ
|
|
|
| from between the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTABL
|
raš
|
|
|
| from near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERALL
|
t̄iši
|
|
|
| towards over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBALL
|
L'aši
|
|
|
| towards under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INALL
|
aši
|
|
|
| towards inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
PL.INTERALL
|
um -
|
če -
|
qɪaši
|
|
|
| towards between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTALL
|
rši
|
|
|
| towards near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERTRANS
|
t̄iXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBTRANS
|
L'aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTRANS
|
aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERTRANS
|
qIaXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
| Language: |
Archi |
| Source: |
Kibrik (1998:470-1) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
ImmediatePastTense
|
Definition:
| ImmediatePastTense locates the situation in question at a
time considered very recent in relation to the moment of utterance (Comrie
1985: 87).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
ImperfectiveAspect
|
Definition:
| ImperfectiveAspect encodes the internal temporal structure of an event from within. It indicates that the event is a process without emphasizing its end points, although there may be the entailment that the event has a starting/end point (Comrie 1976: 24; Dahl 1999: 33).
|
Comment:
|
The first of the examples illustrates imperfective aspect and may be compared with the second example, which illustrates perfective aspect.
|
Example:
|
|
|
| he was going there (he was on the way) |
|
|
|
|
| Language: |
Marathi |
| Source: |
Bhat (1999:46),Bernsten and Nimbkar (1982) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
InablativeCase
|
Definition:
| InablativeCase expresses that the referent of the noun it marks is the location from within which another referent is moving. It has the meaning 'from within'.
|
Example:
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
lit
SG.SUPERESS
|
|
|
| on the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBESS
|
ʟ́
|
|
|
| under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INESS
|
a
|
|
|
| inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
um -
PL.INTERESS
|
če -
|
qɪ
|
|
|
| between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERLAT
|
t̄ -
|
iš
|
|
|
| onto the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBLAT
|
L'ak
|
|
|
| towards the underneath of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.ILL
|
a -
|
k
|
|
|
| into the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INTERLAT
|
qɪak
|
|
|
| towards the middle of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTLAT
|
rak
|
|
|
| in the vicinity of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERABL
|
t̄iš
|
|
|
| from over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBABL
|
L'aš
|
|
|
| from under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INABL
|
a -
|
ŝ
|
|
|
| from within the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERABL
|
qɪaŝ
|
|
|
| from between the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTABL
|
raš
|
|
|
| from near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERALL
|
t̄iši
|
|
|
| towards over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBALL
|
L'aši
|
|
|
| towards under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INALL
|
aši
|
|
|
| towards inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
PL.INTERALL
|
um -
|
če -
|
qɪaši
|
|
|
| towards between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTALL
|
rši
|
|
|
| towards near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERTRANS
|
t̄iXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBTRANS
|
L'aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTRANS
|
aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERTRANS
|
qIaXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
| Language: |
Archi |
| Source: |
Kibrik (1998:470-1) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
InallativeCase
|
Definition:
| InallativeCase expresses that something is moving toward the region that is inside the referent of the noun it marks. It has the meaning 'towards in(side)'.
|
Example:
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
lit
SG.SUPERESS
|
|
|
| on the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBESS
|
ʟ́
|
|
|
| under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INESS
|
a
|
|
|
| inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
um -
PL.INTERESS
|
če -
|
qɪ
|
|
|
| between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERLAT
|
t̄ -
|
iš
|
|
|
| onto the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBLAT
|
L'ak
|
|
|
| towards the underneath of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.ILL
|
a -
|
k
|
|
|
| into the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INTERLAT
|
qɪak
|
|
|
| towards the middle of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTLAT
|
rak
|
|
|
| in the vicinity of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERABL
|
t̄iš
|
|
|
| from over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBABL
|
L'aš
|
|
|
| from under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INABL
|
a -
|
ŝ
|
|
|
| from within the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERABL
|
qɪaŝ
|
|
|
| from between the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTABL
|
raš
|
|
|
| from near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERALL
|
t̄iši
|
|
|
| towards over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBALL
|
L'aši
|
|
|
| towards under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INALL
|
aši
|
|
|
| towards inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
PL.INTERALL
|
um -
|
če -
|
qɪaši
|
|
|
| towards between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTALL
|
rši
|
|
|
| towards near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERTRANS
|
t̄iXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBTRANS
|
L'aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTRANS
|
aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERTRANS
|
qIaXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
| Language: |
Archi |
| Source: |
Kibrik (1998:470-1) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
InceptiveAspect
|
Definition:
| InceptiveAspect, also called the ingressive,
encodes the beginning portion of some event (Bybee 1985: 147, 149; Payne
1997: 240).
|
Comment:
|
The first example , with inceptive aspect, may be compared with the second example, which lacks inceptive aspect. In these examples, the inceptive is formed via affixation
|
Example:
|
wetgawə -
speak-
|
ŋŋo -
INCEPT-
|
k
INF
|
|
|
| to begin speaking |
|
|
|
|
| Language: |
Chukot |
| Source: |
Muravyova (1998:537) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Indicative
|
Definition:
| Indicative
|
Comment:
|
The first example above, illustrating Indicative mood, may be compared with the second, which illustrates Subjunctive mood. Here, the subjunctive is used to express doubt about a proposition.
|
Example:
|
|
|
|
aprende
learn-
3.SG.PRES.INDIC
|
|
|
| I believe that he is learning |
|
|
|
|
|
aprende
learn-
3.SG.PRES.INDIC
|
|
|
| I doubt that he is learning |
|
|
| Language: |
Spanish |
| Source: |
Palmer (2001:5),Klein (1975) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
IndirectEvidential
|
Definition:
| IndirectEvidential, also called reported, encodes the fact that the speaker came to believe the content of the expression from a source other than by experiencing the situation directly (Palmer 2001: 40).
|
Comment:
|
Palmer refers to the Direct Evidential as Sensory Evidential and the Indirect Evidential as the 'reported' or 'linguistic evidential'
|
Example:
|
ŋindu -
you-
|
gara
NOM-
SENSE
|
|
|
|
| One can see you were sick |
|
|
ŋindu -
you-
|
dhan
NOM-
LINGEVID
|
|
|
|
| You are said to have been sick |
|
|
| Language: |
Wangaaybuwan-ngiyambaa |
| Source: |
Palmer (2001:36),Donaldson (1980) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
InessiveCase
|
Definition:
| InessiveCase expresses that the referent of the noun it
marks is the location within which another referent exists. It has the
meaning of 'within' or 'inside' (Lyons 1968: 299; Gove, et al. 1966: 1156;
Crystal 1985: 156). X in Y.
|
Example:
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
lit
SG.SUPERESS
|
|
|
| on the apple |
|
|
|
| | |